From Passive to Active Road Traffic Management

How most of the current traffic control systems are far away from achieving what they are made for and some potential solutions



This might not be a typical system to be discussed here, but for me the road traffic management systems are a clear example of how an inefficient operating model results in certain outcomes that are mostly the opposite of everything that it was made for. A lot of public money is dedicated to building huge infrastructure projects in cities around the world and sometimes the way these infrastructures are managed lead to huge losses to the economy in the form of wasted time, increased pollution or unnecessary and unproductive increases in assets depreciation.


The main objective of traffic management is to achieve the safe and efficient movement of people and goods on roadways and this includes allowing safe and efficient traffic flow through planning sidewalks and crosswalk, traffic signs, traffic lights, road surface markings and cycling infrastructure.


But since in most cases these planning activities result in static forms of roads structure and traffic lights signaling, these roads, no matter how fancy they are, aren’t able to accommodate the dynamic realities of traffic flow through out different directions, different hours of the day, different days of the week, or different seasons in the year. And the results of such inability are massive. In addition to road rage, traffic congestion negative effects include wasting people’s time on a non-productive activity, inability to forecast travel time accurately, wasting more fuel which increases air pollution, increasing the wear and tear of vehicles and most importantly traffic congestion can cause death to certain emergency cases who couldn’t reach a hospital on time. The last effect is especially important in the many countries which don’t have alternative transportation, e.g. a helicopter, for emergency patients.


One way to deal with this is to give traffic lights the ability to process data onsite in real time to monitor traffic patterns in each direction and then use this data to create a more responsive timing which will help solve a lot of the bottle necks in the roads that cause traffic congestion. Traffic lights with such a capability can coordinate with each other to create the optimum traffic flow in given area.


Another idea is to dynamically manage and control the transportation recourses and at the same time influence the traffic demand on roads. This can be done through the dynamic adjustment of speed limits on certain parts of the road to manage the flow of vehicles approaching certain congested points. Also, the direction of lanes can be dynamically changed to accommodate different capacity requirements for the two direction of a road. Real time warnings and alternative route suggestions can also help solve this problem by directing some of the traffic flow to alternative roads that still has capacity.


I believe that making our roads smarter can significantly significantly reduce the losses that the whole economy incurs due to the mismatch between the objectives of a traffic planning system and the current static operating system. Adopting a more dynamic system will result in a much better utilization of the same resources, avoid bottlenecks and reduce the average commute time between any two points within the system.





Whole Foods: Creating An Organic Experience


Barrick Gold Corporation

Student comments on From Passive to Active Road Traffic Management

  1. Ahmed – I enjoyed this post as traffic is something everyone has had to deal with. Your perspective on the importance of road efficiency is spot on and I also wonder what the best solutions are. Dynamic traffic lights are definitely an efficient way to improve road utilization, but are limited to short-haul transportation lanes (i.e. not highways). Changing speed limits and lane directions may present a safety concern as changing driving environments requires drivers to be more attentive in their daily commutes (to use TOM terminology, it increases variability in the processes). Real time warnings and alternative routing are probably the cheapest and easiest to implement (Google Maps and Waze are already doing this), but also create distractions for drivers who are now watching their cell phones for directions rather than the road.

    In addition to improving efficiency on the existing assets, I optimistically think part of the solution will be adding additional infrastructure. Cities can build subway and bus systems that reduce car usage and even expand or supplement roads that experience the worst traffic. Unfortunately, though, these solutions take a lot more planning and funding and are therefore likely years away.

  2. I agree that while dynamics traffic lights might be efficient in short-haul transportation lanes, they might be problematic over long-haul lanes. I also wonder to what extent other traffic control mechanisms such as round-abouts fit into the discussion. For one, I imagine other factors such as the population density or number of cars in an area might be a factor. Also, how doe this discussion change when you look at more rugged nations where there are a significant number of pedestrians on foot and thus increase the variability on the roads? Fascinating post, thanks for sharing.

Leave a comment