Medium: creating a new writing platform for the masses

A new solution to tackle the problem of a struggling journalism industry: a publishing platform that enables everyone to share their stories and ideas.

We are not paying for quality journalism. At least, not like we used to. Subscriptions to newspapers are at an all-time low. And online and offline advertising has not brought the riches we hoped for either. The result? Quality journalism increasingly under threat.

Ev Williams – a former co-founder of Twitter – introduced a new solution to tackle this problem: a publishing platform that enables everyone to share their stories and ideas.

Medium was born.

It might not sound revolutionary, but there is a double twist. First, the platform is all about reader interaction, e.g. exposure is based on how readers vote an article up or down, rather than through editorial discretion. Second, it is not about the author, but all about the content, e.g. instead of categorizing your work after publishing, you first think about the topic you want to contribute to, and only then start writing (NiemanLab, 2012).


To get traction, Medium had to build two separate value propositions: getting the writers to write, and publications to publish; and getting the readers to read.

That was not an easy proposition: due to network effects, it is difficult to create value for both readers and writers. Having more readers on Medium will make it more interesting for other readers to join: it allows you to see which articles are trending, follow what friends or key opinion leaders read, and comment and discuss with peers. In addition, for writers and publishers, it is also advantageous: the more people are on the platform the higher the likelihood that readers will find my articles, and give me access to a new stream of potential readers.

It’s a classic self-fulfilling prophecy: the more people are on it, the more newspapers want to be on it; and the more newspapers are on it, the more people will find the platform, and the more publishers need to be on it to beat competition.


Medium realized that the key was getting people to start publishing – the readers would follow. As a result, it did everything it could to get writers to use the program. Three actions stand out.

First, by making the platform incredibly easy to use. If you think WordPress is easy, try Medium. Within 5 minutes you could have a beautiful blog up-and-running.

Second, by allowing only a select group of journalists and whiz kids to use it at first, creating a certain exclusiveness (and secretly hire a few top writers to help produce excellent early content) (The Atlantic, 2013).

Third and last, by developing a sophisticated content management system built for larger publications. For instance, Pacific Standard, who admitted to never having a developer in the first place, was given a whole team that helped transfer its entire archive to Medium. After they migrated, they got access to Medium’s proprietary tools such as customizable paywalls and sponsored content (NiemanLab, 2016).

In so doing, Medium was quick to establish itself: big publications such as ThinkProgress, The Awl, The Ringer, and later also Forbes, started migrating to the system. In total, more than 7.5 million posts have been published. And readers quickly following: 60 million unique monthly visitors (up 140% from last year’s numbers, and quickly catching up with the New York Times who has 72.9 million unique visitors) (Adage, 2017; VentureBeat, 2016).


The question remains if Medium has enough time to beat the competition, become the platform by default, and then start capturing value.

Investors are getting anxious. In January of this year, CEO Williams was forced to reduce its staff by 33% (letting go of 50 of the 150 employees) (Medium, 2017; NiemanLab, 2017). It comes at an inconvenient time: with lots of publishers considering migration, further uncertainty about the platform’s future might have serious consequences. They will only migrate if they can be sure they will be supported in years to come.

The problem of multi-homing still exists: both newspapers and users are still using different applications. Although Medium is trying to lock-in its customers on both sides (through newsletters, subscriptions, and full archive migration), they face an uphill battle.

And then there’s the challenge of competing platforms such as Facebook. They too are entering the content market. The more people are captured by content, the more likely they are to stay on a platform (explaining the introduction of instant articles by Facebook – they ensure people do not multi-home).


Adage (2017).

VentureBeat (2016).

NiemanLab (2012).

NiemanLab (2016).

NiemanLab (2017).

The Atlantic (2013).

Medium (2017).



Facebook Bets Big on Bots with Messenger Platform


Steam: The iTunes of Video Games

Student comments on Medium: creating a new writing platform for the masses

  1. Great article! I always find that Medium has high quality articles, and I now know the reason. What is its strategy to attract more readers? Readers are the key for platforms like this. Do you think its growth in readers has already reached a plateau?

  2. Thanks for a very interesting article. I can’t wait to see if Medium will ever be able to capture significant value by charging subscribers for a premium content. ( It has become very attractive for executives to publish about their firms and give their article an objective / journalist look. I wonder if Medium should be focusing on monetizing more from the authors by filtering the nature of the content. What do you think?

  3. Great concept. In some ways, this platform would have to be “less social.” The problem with “trending now” features on social platforms is that they direct users to content that people in their social circle are accessing – people who think just like us. So diversity of perspective is completely lost. I think Medium would succeed only if its algorithms rely completely on global rankings of an article. Users could express preference for certain perspective, but please don’t show me only those articles that my HBS classmates are reading. I don’t want to live in a bubble.

  4. Thanks for the article, Daniel! I like how you dissected Medium’s strategy and explained how it has become what it is today. It seems like Medium has become the leading place for people to post their thoughts in blog format. Although multi-homing is not very difficult for writers to do, it seems like a nuisance to publish the same post on multiple platforms. Do you think that this multi-homing will continue to be an issue once the platform reaches massive scale? My guess is that the more content that authors publish, the higher the switching costs become, decreasing the likelihood that they will leave.

Leave a comment