Reducing Carbon Emissions: Ford’ing Ahead

Responsible for 31% of CO2 emissions in the United States, the transportation industry has a strong impact on global climate change. In recent years, Ford Motor Company has made key investments in new technology to help reduce its carbon footprint.


The automotive industry and government have had a tumultuous relationship this year. Governments enacted stricter emissions standards, hoping to incentivize the use of biofuels and electricity, and companies like Volkswagen cheated government agencies in what is being dubbed “diesel dupe” – a scam in which Volkswagen installed a device that “knew” when the car was being EPA tested and forced it to operate with less emissions than it would on the open road [1].


Over the last decade, cars have been inextricably linked to CO2 emissions, the largest contributor to greenhouse gasses and global warming. In 2014, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) accounted for 81% of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the United States, or the equivalent of 5.6 billion metric tons. Of CO2 emissions, transportation accounted for 31%, second only to electricity production (37%) [2]. Similarly, the European Union reported cars were responsible for an estimated 12% of CO2 emissions in 2014 [3]. As the scientific link between CO2 and climate change is strengthened, scientists and global citizens are increasingly calling on governments and manufacturers to reduce carbon output.

In order to do so, car manufacturers must navigate a myriad of regulations that multiply in complexity across various countries. However, all regulations seek to solve one common problem: reduction in CO2.

In recent years, Ford has taken important steps to reduce its carbon footprint by increasing fuel economy. To increase miles per gallon, Ford has introduced Eco-Boost technology which combines both direct-fuel injection and turbo-charge. Direct-fuel injection is similar to just-in-time processing where the fuel is delivered to the right pistons at the right time, with minimal waste. Turbo-charging is a fancy term for using the engine’s own exhaust to pull in air from outside the car. Explosions move pistons and explosions need air, so by turbo-charging the engine, gas can explode at a greater magnitude. Additionally, Ford has altered their transmissions to include more gears. Incremental gears allow for smoother transitions between speeds, maximizing each gear with less fuel.


Ford has also experimented with new materials to develop a light-weight concept car.  By using light-weight composites instead of steel, Ford reduced the weight of a comparable Fusion by 800 pounds. This reduction in weight pays dividends, allowing the car to operate with a smaller engine, further reducing required fuel usage.

A second way Ford has decreased its emissions is by incorporating alternative fuels such as clean-diesel, biofuel, hydrogen-fuel and battery-powered vehicles. Interestingly, biofuel emits the same CO2 as everyday gas, however, its net emissions are zero since plants used to create biofuel absorb the same CO2 they emit upon combusting. Another important consideration is battery-powered vehicles and their use of electricity. Despite the buzz surrounding their use, creating electricity itself is one of the biggest contributors to overall CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. If innovations are to decrease global CO2, it is important to understand where in the supply chain this decrease occurs. In the case of electricity, it is important we source our electricity from wind, solar and other renewable sources [4].

In 2012, Ford assessed 91% of its GHG emissions came from older models, 1.4% from facilities, and 7% from new vehicles. Further contributing to its low facilities percentage is Ford’s innovative use of carbon emissions from its own factories, which it is learning to reprocesses into foam for seats.

Despite Ford’s progress, it is clear that Ford’s older model cars are contributing to the majority of its GHG emissions. While Ford does have a scrap buy-back program, it appears a bit weak, and likely correlated with the lack of governmental focus on this part of the business, proving yet again environmental consciousness is all well and good until it has an adverse affect on a firm’s bottom line. In order to sell a new car, Ford has to meet the new standards of government and consumers. Hopefully, as these older cars are phased out, their affect on the environment will lessen.

Additionally, Ford’s mixed track record is highlighted by its late abdication from the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), an organization that promotes the denial of climate change [5]. Better late than never, I suppose.

Far from altruistic, Ford, the automotive industry, and regulatory agencies have taken great strides to address climate change. This past year, the CEOs of several of the world’s largest manufacturers, along with suppliers, signed a commitment to help “decarbonize” automotive transportation [6]. Through its science-based approach, Ford hopes to do its part to stabilize CO2 concentration at 450 PPM (a widely recognized tipping point metric), and by 2030 Ford estimates to be about 1% of global car emissions. Unlikely to act in the absence of economic incentives, let us hope government puts appropriate measures in place to continually incentivize capitalist companies to reduce emissions and slow climate change.


Tipping Point

Word Count: 795

[1] Russell Hotten, “Volkswagen: The scandal explained,” BBC News, December 10, 2015, [], accessed November 2016.

[2] “Overview of Greenhouse Gases,” EPA (2014), [] accessed November 2016.

[3] “Reducing CO2 emissions from passenger cars,” European Commission (2016) [] accessed November 2016.

[4] Ford, “Sustainability Report,” [], accessed November 2016.

[5] Nick Surgery, “Ford Becomes Latest Corporation Dumping ALEC and Its Climate Denial,” The Huffington Post, February 2, 2016, [], accessed November 2016.

[6] Joann Muller, “Auto Industry CEOs Unite In Rare Vow To Combat Climate Change”, Forbes, December 15, 2015 [], accessed November 2016.


Intercontinental Hotel Group: Making Sleep Sustainable


Farming the Data

Student comments on Reducing Carbon Emissions: Ford’ing Ahead

  1. This post raises an interesting weakness point in innovative plans to mitigate climate change without a very decisive supporting regulation – unless proper incentives are set, it will take many years to implement any plan, and we might be too late.
    The average car age in the US is constantly increasing. In fact, a typical car in the US is 11.5 years old, and 14 million cars on US roads are more than 25 years old. With improvements in car quality and reliability, consumers are expected to hold their vehicles even longer. Under these circumstances, even the most amazing green technologies will take years to create a substantial decrease in GHG emissions.
    Strong governmental regulations that force getting old cars off the road are the only way to create a real change sooner rather than later.

    (See Bureau of Transportation: Average Age of Automobiles and Trucks in Operation in the United States

    1. I agree that taking old cars off the road will be an issue and this will stand in the way of large scale adoption of environmentally friendly alternatives. But even with strong governmental regulations that would lead to getting these old cars off the road (including commercial vehicles, which have a much shorter useful life cycle, as they have higher utilization rates), another issue I would consider is the environmental impact of disposing of these obsolete vehicles and ensuring that they are not just transferred/resold to another part of the world where they would continue this vicious pollution cycle. Therefore, I would argue that regulations should include the recycling of such vehicles, to ensure that valuable raw materials make their way back into the system instead of landfills. Nevertheless the economics of this sound daunting, as new materials will probably be cheaper, more reliable and more easily available as compared to recycled one, at least in the beginning. I believe that this sector should be built up and receive substantial support in order to truly make an impact, reduce GHG emissions and ultimately reverse climate change.
      Retrofitting combustion engine vehicles to electric or fuel cell technology could also be a viable option, thus speeding up the adoption of new environmentally friendly technology without having to replace all vehicles on the road with new ones.

  2. Really interesting stuff! It’s great to hear that Ford is taking such big steps towards striving to be eco-friendly. This is a little out of left field, but I hear there’s a material that can take CO2 out of the air… Is it crazy to think that they might be able to add some sort of material such as this to the tops of the car to reduce the overall CO2 in the air as well?

  3. Great article Eric! Captures well how the automative industry faces and contributes to environmental challenges. While mitigation efforts such as the use of Eco-boost technology and alternative fuels are laudable, however, the issue of weak scrap/buy back program needs to resolved by Ford despite the absence incentives by government at this stage. I also recollect that PepsiCo has a program to convert its existing fleet trucks to electric/hybrid fuel technology and Ford can play a substantive role with other players and government to roll out “fuel conversion” program for existing vehicles. By taking the initiative, Ford would be paving way for greener technologies to stream in faster and also to then focus on innovating to make green cars affordable for the masses.

Leave a comment