• Student

Activity Feed

On November 15, 2018, ssingayapally commented on vTaiwan: Crowdsourcing Legislation in Technology and Beyond :

I love the idea of citizens pitching in their opinions on thoughts to a democratically elected government even after the election cycle is done. I think one of the major benefits is that it showcases if elected representatives veer too far away from promises originally made or lets them know if public opinion has shifted since they were elected. While this is a brilliant idea in an economically developed and relatively homogeneous society like Taiwan, I would be worried about the same system becoming dominant in developing countries. To me, internet access in a developing country implies a higher socioeconomic class and concentrating opinion to one group of people would be contrary to democracy!

Your article is very enlightening about the benefits of predicting maintenance problems in rigs and it’s impressive how RDS has implemented these techniques in their major operations. As I think about this, I can’t help but wonder how an ML algorithm would fare in predicting large scale disasters, especially because such disasters have been few in number so data can be hard to find and might be triggered sometimes by the most random and seemingly insignificant factors. To me, it looks like there’s going to be the need to do some sort of balancing between the signals generated by machines and the intuition of engineers – how this can be done I cannot wait to see!

On November 14, 2018, ssingayapally commented on The Rise of Automotive Additive Manufacturing :

As I read this I wonder if innovation in this industry will shift from OEMs and large companies to “startups”. Given the capital intensive methods of innovation now, a lot of the new developments seem to be coming in from existing players. 3D printing, to me has the potential to allow smaller firms, or even individual designers to manufacture. Since the customers would be the OEMs, they would potentially have to do the testing and sign-off but it appears to be a good place to start!

On November 14, 2018, ssingayapally commented on Open Innovation in Pharma R&D :

I think one of the major challenges for this model is that manufacturing at scale of pharmaceutical products is tightly regulated (as it should be). The costs are also prohibitive for a newcomer, let alone a non-profit that is not attempting to patent its inventions. I agree with the comment above on the need for a partnership with the government that can potentially provide cost assistance when it comes to manufacturing, either by focusing only on the required regulations rather than an all-encompassing set or through a grants program. For molecules that are mandated by the WHO etc. (which might require a minimum fixed volume), perhaps CO-ADD could work with contract manufacturing organizations and negotiate a preset price at fixed margins?

On November 14, 2018, ssingayapally commented on Gantri Shines a Light on 3D Printing for Home Décor :

This beautifully written essay highlights how in the future consumers may not have to pay through the roof for niche items! While mass production has allowed a lot of people access to essentials (and then some), the same techniques do not work for any goods that have a limited market. I agree that 3D printing has allowed companies like Gantri to function but I am curious what their competitive advantage will be especially since a competitor can also manufacture easily, especially if they do not employ the designers or own their designs. In the long term, if they evolve to become a platform that connects designers and manufacturers, I think they should continue to manufacture which would be their core competency but also operate a marketplace model for manufacturers.

On November 14, 2018, ssingayapally commented on Machine Learning for Machines :

Akash, this is a brilliant article about using research to drive further research! I think as investigators continue to rely on systems like this to tweak decisions in their iterative testing process, they can use their time to do more of the divergent thinking you talked about. My understanding of ML is that we are relying on machines to identify pathways to an acceptable convergence but in a field like this where sometimes divergent thinking provides solutions, I think there is always a role for humans. In addition, while Kebotix’s products would help reduce the impact of bias by choosing the best path forward rather than on intuition but at the same time, the researchers’ bias might be what would lead to a breakthrough!