I have been very satisfied with the late changes that our administration took and is taking.<\/p>\n
However, after 5 years, we hit a halt or in other words, a wall.<\/p>\n
This year while I was in Boston, I denied to do my own self assessment of my projected year which we do every year. That is second year on a row that I abstain. The reason for my action is very simple, If administration claim transparency, why I cannot evaluate my seniors and superior or even my co workers. I always thought, 360 degree evaluation is both way, but turned out that is not true, 360 degree evaluation meant when explained by my administration is as simple as\u00a0 is when multiple people evaluate one person.<\/p>\n
The main reason for this replay is that our supervisors are sensitive to criticism and they are doing their best to change an old resistant culture.<\/p>\n
So, my question, should I fill my self evaluation after reasoning I was given or should I take a stand for what I believe transparency should be.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Transparency, 360 degree evaluation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12201,"featured_media":510,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","categories":[376,432],"class_list":["post-505","hck-submission","type-hck-submission","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-leadership","category-management","hck-taxonomy-organization-university-hospital","hck-taxonomy-industry-health","hck-taxonomy-country-united-states"],"connected_submission_link":"https:\/\/d3.harvard.edu\/platform-mhcdsolutions\/conversation\/mhcd-solutions\/","yoast_head":"\n